Thursday 5 May 2011

Critical Reflection and Summary: Digital Portfolio

This module is about further examining my professional practice to define a line of inquiry by extending the skills learnt in the previous module and exploring new tools and techniques.   I currently work in several professional practices and I am keen to make use of as many areas as possible; however, I am foremost a dancer and my special interest is the image aspect of the profession.
My strategy was to start with an idea and to refine the subject into a title. Firstly, I used my interest in costumes as a spring board to ask my initial questions.  I used my blog to reflect on the course reader and posted my first set of questions.  I then used a SIG to encourage further feedback and pushed my questions out to a wider network within my professional practice.   I also had some informal chats with my employers and colleagues to get a more rounded and richer viewpoint. 


Some of the responses were really helpful and I started to think about how costumes support confidence and image. I also engaged in some other SIGs which I felt were relevant and I could contribute to; for example, Musical Theatre, TV Industry.  On reflecting on the comments, feedback and information gained from the other SIGs I started to challenge my broad ideas and develop my questions.  At this stage I was still not confident on an award title.

I then moved on to carry out research specifically around professional ethics.  I started this exercise by baselining my knowledge on what I already knew about the code of conduct for my area of professional practice.  I then researched the topic and recorded the differences between my initial thoughts and my findings. 
I soon began to realise how intricate and delicate a subject this was, especially when conducting a professional inquiry.  The research gave me a firm understanding, foundation and a structure to use in the planning and execution of my inquiry.   It made me realise that ethics is a core part of any professional practice and although some areas are common there are some profession specifics.  It also made me think about my personal values and compromise I would be willing to make in order to further my career.
At this stage I made my first attempt at an award title and started to investigate inquiry tools.  It was when I planned and piloted the inquiry tools I exposed my lack of confidence I had in my title. I struggled with defining suitable questions and used a very qualitative approach to the survey which I felt did not suit that specific tool; this view was supported by some of the participant feedback.  I used a semi-structured format for the 1:1 interviews and organised a focus group which helped me explore some areas further.
When reflecting on the approach and outcome of the pilot inquiry tools I realised the quality of response to the survey was poor and the 1:1 interviews only answered part of my inquiry.  I then looked back at my initial questions and comments to see how I could improve on them and redefine my title.
My last task was to review and research some key pieces of literature related to my interest.  Initially I struggled to find any appropriate, useful or relevant information and it was only when a related document presented itself that I realised what I wanted for my line of inquiry and award title.  Having settled on a title I then found a wealth of resources and I chose three pieces of literature to review.

Although I found the process very frustrating, I finally realised that what you don’t know is as important as what you do know.  My line of inquiry is going to be Personal Branding.

No comments:

Post a Comment